4.7 Article

Recycling of EPDM via Continuous Thermo-Mechanical Devulcanization with Co-Rotating Twin-Screw Extruder

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14224853

关键词

recycling; devulcanization; EPDM; co-rotating twin-screw-extruder; waste valorization

资金

  1. REGIONE PIEMONTE, POR-FESR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on the thermo-mechanical devulcanization of post-industrial EPDM rubber using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. The results showed that higher thermal profile and screw speed led to higher devulcanization percentage, and the screw profile composition also affected the efficiency of devulcanization.
Devulcanization represents the recycling of choice for a homogenous rubber waste stream because it allows revulcanization of samples previously devulcanized, making the life of the rubber virtually endless, according to the principles of circular economy. Among the many devulcanization processes, the thermo-mechanical one is the most appealing because it is a continuous process, easy to be industrialized. In this paper a comprehensive set of analyses (FTIR, TGA, DSC, elemental analyses, Py-GC/MS, swelling tests) were carried out on a post-industrial ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), thermo-mechanical devulcanized in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder with different process parameters (thermal and screw profile, rpm). Results of the swelling test according to the Flory-Rehner theory and Horikx analyses show that the higher the thermal profile and the higher the rpm, the higher is the percentage of devulcanization. The quality of the devulcanized sample in terms of sol fraction and percentage of random scissions depends on the process conditions. The screw profile concurs to the efficiency of the devulcanization: the different number of kneading elements and more in general the screw profile composition affects the percentage of devulcanization, making the results in some tests more dependent on the screw speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据