4.7 Article

A Fatigue Model to Predict Interlaminar Damage of FRP Composite Laminates Subjected to Mode I Load

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15030527

关键词

cyclic cohesive zone model; damage mechanics; interface fatigue crack; interlaminar property degradation; fiber-reinforced polymer composite laminates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fatigue damage model is developed to quantify the mechanics of interlaminar damage in fiber-reinforced polymer composite structures under fluctuating stresses. The model considers degradation of interlaminar elastic properties and dissipation of fracture energy. The model is validated through a case study of a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer laminate, showing good agreement with experimental data.
In fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite laminate structures operating under fluctuating stresses, interface delamination is seen as one of the significant damage mechanisms. The constant degradation of their relatively low interlaminar strength and stiffness are the primary reasons for delamination. This study develops an interlaminar fatigue damage model to quantify the mechanics of the damage process and address the reliability of composite structures. The model considers the failure process in two stages: (1) damage due to degradation of interlaminar elastic properties, and (2) damage due to dissipation of fracture energy through the damage evolution process. The model is examined for a case study of mode I fatigue loading of a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite laminate. The results show that the interlaminar normal stress is confined to the crack front region, with tensile stress peaks at 70% of the interlaminar strength. Furthermore, a stable interface crack growth is predicted initially, followed by a sudden crack jump at 14,000 cycles. The simulation results are compared with the experimental data, with very good agreement, showing a successful validation of the fatigue model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据