4.7 Article

Low Impact Velocity Modeling of 3D Printed Spatially Graded Elastomeric Lattices

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14214780

关键词

additive manufacturing; spatially graded lattices; finite element analysis; thermoplastic polyurethane

资金

  1. Youngstown State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research focuses on the manufacturing, testing, and modeling of thermoplastic polyurethane lattices. Using a Kelvin unit cell, non-graded and spatially side-graded lattices were designed and built. Experimental and numerical analysis showed good agreement between the simulated and experimental results under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loads.
Additive manufacturing technologies have facilitated the construction of intricate geometries, which otherwise would be an extenuating task to accomplish by using traditional processes. Particularly, this work addresses the manufacturing, testing, and modeling of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) lattices. Here, a discussion of different unit cells found in the literature is presented, along with the based materials used by other authors and the tests performed in diverse studies, from which a necessity to improve the dynamic modeling of polymeric lattices was identified. This research focused on the experimental and numerical analysis of elastomeric lattices under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loads, using a Kelvin unit cell to design and build non-graded and spatially side-graded lattices. The base material behavior was fitted to an Ogden 3rd-order hyperelastic material model and used as input for the numerical work through finite element analysis (FEA). The quasi-static and impact loading FEA results from the lattices showed a good agreement with the experimental data, and by using the validated simulation methodology, additional special cases were simulated and compared. Finally, the information extracted from FEA allowed for a comparison of the performance of the lattice configurations considered herein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据