4.7 Article

Development of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Device Using Four-Bore Tubing and Its Applications of In-Liquid Material Decomposition and Solution Plasma Polymerization

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14224917

关键词

atmospheric pressure plasma; multi-bore tube; phosphorus compound decomposition; plasma polymerization; plasma processing; plasma treatment

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government [2020R1I1A3071693, 2021R1I1A3049028]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1I1A3049028, 2020R1I1A3071693] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) device is described, which is operational in humid environments. It can be used for the decomposition of aqueous phosphorus compounds and the synthesis of polypyrrole nanoparticles.
In this study, we describe an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) device made of four-bore tubing operable in inhospitable humid environments and introduce two potential applications of liquid material processing: decomposition of aqueous phosphorus compounds and solution-plasma polymerization. A four-bore tube was used as the plasma transfer conduit and two diagonal bores contained metal wires. In the proposed APPJ device, the metal wires serving as electrodes are completely enclosed inside the holes of the multi-bore glass tube. This feature allows the APPJ device to operate both safely and reliably in humid environments or even underwater. Thus, we demonstrate that the proposed electrode-embedded APPJ device can effectively decompose aqueous phosphorus compounds into their phosphate form by directly processing the solution sample. As another application of the proposed APPJ device, we also present the successful synthesis of polypyrrole nanoparticles by solution plasma polymerization in liquid pyrrole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据