4.5 Article

Lavandula multifida response to salinity: Growth, nutrient uptake, and physiological changes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 180, 期 1, 页码 96-104

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201600062

关键词

biomass; mineral composition; proline; salt stress index; starch; sugars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fern leaf lavender (Lavandula multifida L.) is a perennial shrub native to Almeria with known medicinal properties, which grows in saline soils that are increasingly present in the Mediterranean region. However, the effects of salinity on the mineral nutrition and physiology of L. multifida are unknown. In the present study, we evaluated the salt resistance of this species and compared it with other members of the Lamiaceae. Plants of L. multifida were grown in pots in a mixture of sphagnum peat-moss and Perlite, and treated with five different NaCl concentrations [10 (control), 30, 60, 100, and 200 mM NaCl] over a period of 60 d. The effects of different levels of salinity on mineral nutrient and osmolyte concentrations and on biomass were evaluated. Our results show that L. multifida plants were able to grow with 60 mM NaCl without significant biomass reduction. Na+ and Cl- were the main contributors to the osmotic potential in both roots and leaves, whereas total soluble sugars (TSS) and proline made only a small contribution. The concentrations of TSS and proline showed different trends in the different organs: in roots, both showed the highest concentrations at 60 mM NaCl, whereas in leaves TSS increased and proline decreased with increasing salt stress. To survive salinity, L. multifida plants increased salt excretion (Na+ and Cl-) by leaves at 100 and 200 mM NaCl and leaf succulence at 60, 100, and 200 mM NaCl. Excessive accumulation of Na+ and Cl- was avoided by shedding leaves. Our results indicate that L. multifida is better adapted to salinity compared to other members of the Lamiaceael, a consideration that is particularly relevant for their growth in and saline areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据