4.7 Article

Variables Affecting the Pine Processionary Moth Flight: A Survey in the North-Western Italian Alps

期刊

FORESTS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f14010031

关键词

Thaumetopoea pityocampa; seasonal flight activity; climate change; forest insect pest; pest outbreak

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted investigations in NW Italy over a five-year period and found that environmental variables and biological parameters affect the population dynamics of the pine processionary moth. The collected data will be valuable for developing predictive risk models and implementing timely and cost-effective countermeasures, given its environmental and sanitary importance.
The pine processionary moth (PPM), Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermuller), is one of the most economically important forest defoliators in southern Europe. This pest is a univoltine oligophagous insect species, and the genus Pinus represents its main host. Investigations were carried out in the five-year period 2016-2020 in NW Italy. PPM males were monitored using commercial funnel traps baited with sex pheromone. The infestation index was recorded by counting the number of nests per tree. Temperature and rainfall were automatically recorded by 94 georeferenced meteorological stations. Adult presence was evaluated as the maximum number of captured individuals in a day, total captures during the season, the Julian day at max captures, or at first or last captures. Environmental variables (altitude, cumulative rain, and cumulative degree-days) and biological parameters were summarized using principal component analysis. Our study showed that the analyzed variables contribute to driving and affecting the PPM population dynamics, which also exhibited a year-to-year decrease. Due to the environmental and sanitary importance, all the data collected about the PPM will be useful to develop predictive risk models, as to deploy countermeasures in a timely and cost-effective manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据