4.4 Review

The treatment of functional dyspepsia: present and future

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2162877

关键词

Abdominal pain; dyspepsia; functional dyspepsia; neuromodulators; virtual reality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) that is often overlooked. Various therapies are used to treat FD, but their effectiveness varies. This review discusses existing and emerging therapies for FD and highlights the importance of considering neuromodulators and fundic accommodation agents for patients with moderate-severe symptoms.
IntroductionFunctional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent, but frequently overlooked and/or under diagnosed disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Functional dyspepsia frequently co-exists with other DGBIs, and persistent symptoms have a significant impact on patients' quality of life. A variety of therapies (e.g. diet, probiotics, antibiotics, acid suppressants, neuromodulators, prokinetics) are employed to treat the multiple symptoms of FD, although none are uniformly effective.Areas coveredThis review covers currently available therapies for the treatment of FD in addition to novel and emerging therapies that may change the treatment paradigm in the near future. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane data bank were searched from 1990 to October 2022 for relevant articles.Expert opinionDietary intervention, eradication of H. pylori, and/or a trial of acid suppression are reasonable initial treatment options for patients with FD. Neuromodulators and fundic accommodation agents are underemployed and should be used more routinely by healthcare providers, especially for patients with moderate-severe symptoms. Alternative therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy, are gaining recognition as safe and effective treatments for FD and can be used alone or in combination with medications. Virtual reality has the potential to significantly improve global FD symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据