4.8 Article

Excitation-inhibition imbalance disrupts visual familiarity in amyloid and non-pathology conditions

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111946

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal hyperactivity disrupts memory in Alzheimer's disease by favoring an imbalance in the synaptic structure and reducing neural response selectivity. Compensatory changes in activity homeostasis increase population sparseness and decrease functional connectivity, leading to visual recognition memory vulnerability. Deprivation of non-specific visual experiences improves neural representation and behavioral expression of visual familiarity, while deprivation in non-pathological conditions induces disinhibition and disrupts visual familiarity.
Neuronal hyperactivity induces memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease. However, how hyperactivity disrupts memory is unclear. Using in vivo synaptic imaging in the mouse visual cortex, we show that structural excitatory-inhibitory synapse imbalance in the apical dendrites favors hyperactivity in early amyloidosis. Consistent with this, natural images elicit neuronal hyperactivity in thesemice. Compensatory changes that maintain activity homeostasis disrupt functional connectivity and increase population sparseness such that a small fraction of neurons dominates population activity. These properties reduce the selectivity of neural response to natural images and render visual recognition memory vulnerable to interference. Deprivation of non-specific visual experiences improves the neural representation and behavioral expression of visual familiarity. In contrast, in non-pathological conditions, deprivation of non-specific visual experiences induces disinhibition, increases excitability, and disrupts visual familiarity. We show that disrupted familiarity occurs when the fraction of high-responsive neurons and the persistence of neural representation of a memory-associated stimulus are not constrained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据