4.8 Article

Human FACT subunits coordinate to catalyze both disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 41, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111858

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-1828506, MCB- 1817712]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health grant NCI [R01CA218255]
  4. National Institutes of Health NIGMS [R35 GM136262]
  5. Mayo Clinic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The histone chaperone FACT enhances transcription by targeting DNA-protein interactions. This study demonstrates the impact of FACT on nucleosome stability and dynamics, revealing contradictory functions of different FACT subdomains in nucleosome remodeling. These findings provide insights into the catalytic role of key FACT domains in nucleosome disassembly and reassembly.
The histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) enhances transcription in eukaryotic cells, targeting DNA-protein interactions. FACT, a heterodimer in humans, comprises SPT16 and SSRP1 subunits. We measure nucleosome stability and dynamics in the presence of FACT and critical component domains. Optical tweezers quantify FACT/subdomain binding to nucleosomes, displacing the outer wrap of DNA, dis-rupting direct DNA-histone (core site) interactions, altering the energy landscape of unwrapping, and increasing the kinetics of DNA-histone disruption. Atomic force microscopy reveals nucleosome remodeling, while single-molecule fluorescence quantifies kinetics of histone loss for disrupted nucleosomes, a process accelerated by FACT. Furthermore, two isolated domains exhibit contradictory functions; while the SSRP1 HMGB domain displaces DNA, SPT16 MD/CTD stabilizes DNA-H2A/H2B dimer interactions. However, only intact FACT tethers disrupted DNA to the histones and supports rapid nucleosome reformation over several cycles of force disruption/release. These results demonstrate that key FACT domains combine to catalyze both nucleosome disassembly and reassembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据