4.8 Article

Numb/Parkin-directed mitochondrial fitness governs cancer cell fate via metabolic regulation of histone lactylation

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112033

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell plasticity and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate and lung adenocarcinomas contribute to therapeutic resistance. This study reveals that neuroendocrine cancer cells rely on glycolysis and have fragmented mitochondria with low membrane potential. The Numb/Parkin pathway plays a crucial role in mitochondrial quality control and its deficiency causes metabolic reprogramming and upregulation of neuroendocrine-associated genes through lactate acid production and histone lactylation. These findings suggest that targeting Numb/Parkin-directed mitochondrial fitness could be a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer cell plasticity.
Cell plasticity and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate and lung adenocarcinomas are one of the major reasons for therapeutic resistance to targeted therapy. Whether and how metabolic changes contribute to this adenocarcinoma-to-neuroendocrine cell fate transition remains largely unclear. Here we show that neuroendocrine prostate or lung cancer cells possess mostly fragmented mitochondria with low membrane potential and rely on glycolysis for energy metabolism. We further show an important role of the cell fate determinant Numb in mitochondrial quality control via binding to Parkin and facilitating Parkin-mediated mi-tophagy. Deficiency in the Numb/Parkin pathway in prostate or lung adenocarcinomas causes a metabolic reprogramming featured with a significant increase in production of lactate acid, which subsequently leads to an upregulation of histone lactylation and transcription of neuroendocrine-associated genes. Collectively, the Numb/Parkin-directed mitochondrial fitness is a key metabolic switch and a promising therapeutic target on cancer cell plasticity through the regulation of histone lactylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据