4.7 Article

SPOP inhibits BRAF-dependent tumorigenesis through promoting non-degradative ubiquitination of BRAF

期刊

CELL AND BIOSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00950-z

关键词

SPOP; BRAF; Mutation; Ubiquitination; MAPK; ERK

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation [91957125, 81672558, 81972396, 81773024, 81872260, 82172938]
  3. Science and Technology Research Program of Shanghai [22ZR1406600, 20ZR1404500]
  4. [9DZ2282100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the molecular link between SPOP mutation-driven tumorigenesis and aberrant BRAF-dependent activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway.
Background: The gene encoding the E3 ubiquitin ligase substrate-binding adapter Speckle-type BTB/POZ protein (SPOP) is frequently mutated in prostate cancer (PCa) and endometrial cancer (EC); however, the molecular mechanisms underlying the contribution of SPOP mutations to tumorigenesis remain poorly understood. Methods: BRAF harbors a potential SPOP-binding consensus motif (SBC) motif. Co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that BRAF interacts with SPOP. A series of functional analyses in cell lines were performed to investigate the biological significance of MAPK/ERK activation caused by SPOP mutations. Results: Cytoplasmic SPOP binds to and induces non-degradative ubiquitination of BRAF, thereby reducing the interaction between BRAF and other core components of the MAPK/ERK pathway. SPOP ablation increased MAPK/ERK activation. EC- or PCa-associated SPOP mutants showed a reduced capacity to bind and ubiquitinate BRAF. Moreover, cancer-associated BRAF mutations disrupted the BRAF-SPOP interaction and allowed BRAF to evade SPOP-mediated ubiquitination, thereby upregulating MAPK/ERK signaling and enhancing the neoplastic phenotypes of cancer cells. Conclusions: Our findings provide new insights into the molecular link between SPOP mutation-driven tumorigenesis and aberrant BRAF-dependent activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据