4.3 Article

Exploring the microzooplankton-ichthyoplankton link: a combined field and modeling study of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 147-163

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbw074

关键词

autumn-spawning herring; protozooplankton community; microzooplankton-ichthyoplankton link; individual-based model

资金

  1. BMBF (German Federal Ministry for Education and Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microzooplankton-ichthyoplankton link remains poorly resolved in field studies due to a lack of simultaneous sampling of these predators and potential prey. This study compared the abundance, distribution and growth of larval Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) and the abundance, biomass and composition of micro-and small mesozooplankton throughout the Irish Sea in November 2012 and 2013. In contrast to warmer months, microzooplankton biomass was highest in eastern areas, in the vicinity of the main spawning grounds of herring. Although the protozoan composition differed somewhat between years, dinoflagellates (e.g. Gymnodinium spp., Protoperidinium spp., Ceratium furca) dominated in abundance and/or biomass, similar to other temperate shelf seas in autumn/winter. Spatial differences in the protozoan community were strongly related to hydrographic characteristics (temperature, salinity). Significant relationships between the abundance of larval herring and dinoflagellates (positive) and copepodites (negative) suggested that complex grazing dynamics existed among lower trophic levels. When different, in situ size fractions of zooplankton were used as prey in a larval herring individual-based model, simulations that omitted protozooplankton under-predicted observed (biochemically-based) growth of 8-18 mm larvae. This study suggests that small planktonic organisms (20-300 mu m) should be routinely surveyed to better understand factors affecting larval fish feeding, growth and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据