4.8 Review

Nanomaterial-based CT contrast agents and their applications in image-guided therapy

期刊

THERANOSTICS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 483-509

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/thno.79625

关键词

material science; contrast agent; CT imaging; diagnosis; therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computed tomography (CT) is a widely used diagnostic tool in hospitals worldwide, but it faces limitations in distinguishing soft tissues from normal organs and tumors. To improve imaging sensitivity and contrast, various nanomaterial-based CT contrast agents have been developed. In this review, we discuss CT contrast agents based on gold (Au), bismuth (Bi), lanthanide (Ln), and transition metal (TM) nanomaterials, along with their applications in image-guided therapy. Additionally, we summarize the use of CT image-guided therapy for various diseases and highlight the future perspectives of CT contrast agents and their biomedical applications.
Computed tomography (CT), a diagnostic tool with clinical application, comprehensive coverage, and low cost, is used in hospitals worldwide. However, CT imaging fails to distinguish soft tissues from normal organs and tumors because their mass attenuation coefficients are similar. Various CT contrast agents have been developed in recent years to improve the sensitivity and contrast of imaging. Here, we review the progress of nanomaterial-based CT contrast agents and their applications in image-guided therapy. The CT contrast agents are classified according to their components; gold (Au)-based, bismuth (Bi)-based, lanthanide (Ln)-based, and transition metal (TM)-based nanomaterials are discussed. CT image-guided therapy of diseases, including photothermal therapy (PPT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), gas therapy, sonodynamic therapy (SDT), immunotherapy, starvation therapy, gene therapy (GT), and microwave thermal therapy (MWTT), are reviewed. Finally, the perspectives on the CT contrast agents and their biomedical applications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据