4.7 Article

Social and cognitive factors influencing commercial chicken farmers' antimicrobial usage in Bangladesh

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26859-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adapting the Social Cognitive Theory framework, a cross-sectional study was conducted on 137 commercial chicken farms in Bangladesh to investigate factors influencing farmers' behavior towards the application of antimicrobials. The study found that almost all farmers used antimicrobials for treating poultry diseases, with a significant percentage also using them for healthy growth and increased production. The inappropriate usage of antimicrobials was primarily driven by short-term goals, while farmers' perception of control over antimicrobial administration had a marginal influence. The study suggests the need for targeted education programs to reduce antimicrobial application in poultry flocks.
Adapting the Social Cognitive Theory framework, we conducted a cross-sectional study on 137 commercial chicken farms in Bangladesh to investigate factors influencing the behaviour of farmers towards the application of antimicrobials to their birds. Almost all farmers used antimicrobials to treat poultry diseases, while 38.6% also were using them to promote healthy growth of chickens and 10.2% to increase egg production or improve meat quality. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), we identified that inappropriate usage of antimicrobials (behaviour) was strongly driven by farmers' short-term goals to maintain the health of their chickens in a production cycle (beta = 0.813, p = 0.029), rather than long-term concerns. Farmers' perception about their ability to control antimicrobial administration based on their skills and opportunities (self-efficacy) marginally influenced the short-term goals of antimicrobial usage (beta = 0.301, p = 0.073). The results of this study can be used to develop targeted education programs for farmers, to reduce the application of antimicrobials in their poultry flocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据