4.7 Article

Multi-objective steel plate cutting optimization problem based on real number coding genetic algorithm

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27100-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores a generalized packing method for the rectangular packing problem and proposes an innovative algorithm design based on a genetic algorithm to solve the practical steel plate cutting problem. By establishing a multi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear programming model, the efficient cutting scheme is achieved. The method has achieved significant results in terms of raw material utilization rate and labor reduction, providing guidance for production and processing tasks.
The rectangular packing problem is an NP-complete combinatorial optimization problem. This problem occurs widely in social production scenarios, with steel plate cutting being one example. The cutting scheme for the rectangular packing problem needs to be improved because, without the globally optimal solution, there are many unnecessary edges in the steel cutting process. Based on a practical roll-fed disc shearing steel plate optimization problem, this paper explores a generalized packing method for rectangles of special dimensions and abstractly condenses complex quantitative relationships to establish a multi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear programming model. An innovative algorithm design based on a genetic algorithm is established to plan the cutting scheme in a high-speed and efficient way. The outcome is a utilization rate of up to 92.73% for raw materials and a significant reduction in labor, providing a guide for practical production and processing tasks. The advantages and disadvantages of the model and algorithm are discussed, and it is concluded that this rectangular packing method has strong universality and generalization ability, allowing rectangular packing tasks with large data volumes to be completed within a short time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据