4.7 Article

Alleviation of soil acidification and modification of soil bacterial community by biochar derived from water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27557-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The highly acid sulfate Rangsit soil series in Thailand has caused major agricultural problems. Water hyacinth can be converted to biochar through pyrolysis and used for acid soil amendment. The suitable ratio of water hyacinth biochar, soil, and sand for water convolvulus cultivation was found to be 50 g, 400 g, and 100 g (1:8:2). This soil mixture significantly improved soil pH and promoted optimal water convolvulus growth. Additionally, biochar amendment positively influenced the soil bacterial community.
The highly acid sulfate Rangsit soil series of Rangsit, Pathum-Thani district, Thailand poses a major problem for agriculture in the area. Water hyacinth is a naturally occurring weed that can grow aggressively, causing eutrophication and leading to many severe environmental impacts. Here, through the pyrolysis process, we convert water hyacinth to biochar and use it for acid soil amendment. We found the ratio between biochar, soil, and sand suitable for the cultivation of water convolvulus to be 50 g of biochar, 400 g of soil, and 100 g of sand (1:8:2). This soil mixture improved the pH of the soil from 4.73 to 7.57. The plant height of the water convolvulus grown in the soil mixture was the greatest at 20.45 cm and the plant weight with and without roots was greatest at 2.23 g and 2.52 g, respectively. Moreover, we demonstrated the dominance and high abundance of Bacillus among the community in soil with biochar amendment. Here we provide the first assessment of the appropriate amount of water hyacinth-derived biochar for mitigation of soil acidity and promotion of optimal water convolvulus growth. Moreover, biochar can optimally modify soil bacterial communities that benefit plant development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据