4.7 Article

Ecological factors are likely drivers of eye shape and colour pattern variations across anthropoid primates

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20900-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, under its CRP funding programme [NRF-CRP 20-2017-0001]
  2. Singapore International Graduate Award (SINGA)
  3. European Union [802719]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [802719] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantifies the differences in eye shape and coloration among 77 primate species, finding that species with heavier body weight and terrestrial locomotion have elongated eye outlines, species living closer to the equator have more pigmented conjunctivae, and species living further away from the equator have bluer irises.
External eye appearance across primate species is diverse in shape and colouration, yet we still lack an explanation for the drivers of such diversity. Here we quantify substantial interspecific variation in eye shape and colouration across 77 primate species representing all extant genera of anthropoid primates. We reassess a series of hypotheses aiming to explain ocular variation in horizontal elongation and in colouration across species. Heavier body weight and terrestrial locomotion are associated with elongated eye outlines. Species living closer to the equator present more pigmented conjunctivae, suggesting photoprotective functions. Irises become bluer in species living further away from the equator, adding to existing literature supporting a circadian clock function for bluer irises. These results shift the current focus from communicative, to ecological factors in driving variation in external eye appearance in anthropoid primates. They also highlight the possibility that similar ecological factors contributed to selection for blue eyes in ancestral human populations living in northern latitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据