4.7 Article

Deep learning approaches to predict 10-2 visual field from wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography en face images in glaucoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25660-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI19C0481, HC19C0276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to predict 10-2 visual field using wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography images. By using the Inception-ResNet-V2 model and combining macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness maps with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness maps, the model effectively predicted 10-2 visual field.
Close monitoring of central visual field (VF) defects with 10-2 VF helps prevent blindness in glaucoma. We aimed to develop a deep learning model to predict 10-2 VF from wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) images. Macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness maps with either wide-field en face images (en face model) or retinal nerve fiber layer thickness maps (RNFLT model) were extracted, combined, and preprocessed. Inception-ResNet-V2 was trained to predict 10-2 VF from combined images. Estimation performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) between actual and predicted threshold values, and the two models were compared with different input data. The training dataset comprised paired 10-2 VF and SS-OCT images of 3,025 eyes of 1,612 participants and the test dataset of 337 eyes of 186 participants. Global prediction errors (MAE(point-wise)) were 3.10 and 3.17 dB for the en face and RNFLT models, respectively. The en face model performed better than the RNFLT model in superonasal and inferonasal sectors (P = 0.011 and P = 0.030). Prediction errors were smaller in the inferior versus superior hemifields for both models. The deep learning model effectively predicted 10-2 VF from wide-field SS-OCT images and might help clinicians efficiently individualize the frequency of 10-2 VF in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据