4.7 Article

Developing a carpet cloak operating for a wide range of incident angles using a deep neural network and PSO algorithm

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27458-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing invisibility cloaks has always been a fascinating field of research, and metasurface-based carpet cloaks have gained attention for their lower loss and easier fabrication. However, their performance is dependent on the incident angle, making it challenging to design a carpet cloak that renders objects invisible for a wide range of angles. This paper presents a metasurface-based carpet cloak developed using the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm and a trained neural network, capable of operating for a wide range of incident angles. Numerical analysis shows that the designed cloak performs well for incident angles ranging from 0 to 65 degrees.
Designing invisibility cloaks has always been one of the most fascinating fields of research; in this regard, metasurface-based carpet cloaks have drawn researchers' attention due to their inherent tenuousness, resulting in a lower loss and easier fabrication. However, their performances are dependent on the incident angle of the coming wave; as a result, designing a carpet cloak capable of rendering objects under it invisible for a wide range of angles requires advanced methods. In this paper, using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, along with a trained neural network, a metasurface-based carpet cloak is developed capable to operate for a wide range of incident angles. The deep neural network is trained and used in order to accelerate the process of calculation of reflection phases provided by different unit cell designs. The resultant carpet cloak is numerically analyzed, and its response is presented and discussed. Both near-field and far-field results show that the designed carpet cloak operates very well for all incident angles in the range of 0 to 65 degrees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据