4.7 Article

Space-resolved chemical information from infrared extinction spectra

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27619-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method is proposed to extract the complex index of refraction from the extinction efficiency of dielectric spheres. It removes scattering effects and corrects for systematic errors in the measured extinction spectra. The method does not require a reference spectrum and satisfies the Kramers-Kronig relations. It can provide unambiguous interpretation of the chemical information of the sample.
A new method is presented for the extraction of the complex index of refraction from the extinction efficiency, Q(ext)((nu) over tilde), of homogeneous and layered dielectric spheres that simultaneously removes scattering effects and corrects measured extinction spectra for systematic experimental errors such as baseline shifts, tilts, curvature, and scaling. No reference spectrum is required and fit functions may be used that automatically satisfy the Kramers-Kronig relations. Thus, the method yields the complex refractive index of a sample for unambiguous interpretation of the chemical information of the sample. In the case of homogeneous spheres, the method also determines the radius of the sphere. In the case of layered spheres, the method determines the substances within each layer. Only a singleelement detector is required. Using numerically computed Q(ext)((nu) over tilde) data of polymethyl-methacrylate and polystyrene homogeneous and layered spheres, we show that the new reconstruction algorithm is accurate and reliable. Reconstructing the complex refractive index from a published, experimentally measured raw absorbance spectrum shows that the new method simultaneously corrects spectra for scattering effects and, given shape information, corrects raw spectra for systematic errors that result in spectral distortions such as baseline shifts, tilts, curvature, and scaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据