4.7 Article

Advanced maternal age and severe maternal morbidity in South Korea: a population-based cohort study

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25973-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2020R1C1C1013668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the association between maternal age and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in a Korean population. The results showed that teenagers and women aged 35 and older had an increased risk of SMM in both nulliparous and multiparous cases. Furthermore, women aged 40 and older had the highest rates of SMM. Identifying and managing risk factors for SMM in these vulnerable age groups may improve maternal health outcomes.
To investigate the association between maternal age and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in a Korean population. Data for cases of delivery between 2003 and 2019 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Delivery Cohort. The main outcome was SMM, which was determined using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's algorithm. A generalized estimating equation model with a log link was performed for the relationship between SMM and maternal age adjusted for covariates. SMM occurred in 40,959/2,113,615 (1.9%) of delivery cases. Teenagers and women 35 years and older had an increased risk of SMM in both nulliparous and multiparous cases (ages 15-19: risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.46; ages 35-39: RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21-1.28; ages 40-44: RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.50-1.64; and ages 45 or older: RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.75-2.44). Women aged 40 years and older had the highest rates of SMM. In singleton births as well as in nulliparous and multiparous cases, teenagers and women aged 35 years and older had a particularly high risk of SMM. Identifying and managing risk factors for SMM in these vulnerable age groups may improve maternal health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据