4.7 Article

Quantum affective processes for multidimensional decision-making

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22855-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Design under the InnoHK Research Clusters, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government [RP2P3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling the human affective system and applying it to human-robot interaction poses the challenge of handling ambiguous emotional states, probabilistic decisions, and freedom of choice in affective and behavioral patterns. This study attempts a quantum-computational construction of robot affect to address these challenges and provide a system for simulating and handling affective interactions.
In modeling the human affective system and applying lessons learned to human-robot interaction, the challenge is to handle ambiguous emotional states of an agency (whether human or artificial), probabilistic decisions, and freedom of choice in affective and behavioral patterns. Moreover, many cognitive processes seem to run in parallel whereas seriality is the standard in conventional computation. Representation of contextual aspects of behavior and processes and of self-directed neuroplasticity are still wanted and so we attempt a quantum-computational construction of robot affect, which theoretically should be able to account for indefinite and ambiguous states as well as parallelism. Our Quantum Coppelia (Q-Coppelia) is a translation into quantum logics of the fuzzy-based Silicon Coppelia system, which simulates the progression of a robot's attitude towards its user. We show the entire circuitry of the Q-Coppelia framework, aiming at contemporary descriptions of (neuro)psychological processes. Arguably, our work provides a system for simulating and handling affective interactions among various agencies from an understanding of the relations between quantum algorithms and the fundamental nature of psychology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据