4.7 Article

Microbiological analysis and bioremediation bioassay for characterization of industrial effluent

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23480-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. (King Abdulaziz city for science and technology -Riyadh) [1-18-01-00090218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate bacteria for the biodegradation of oil pollutants in oily industrial wastewater and determine the characteristics of bioremediation bioassays. Screening bioassays revealed two bacterial strains that successfully eliminated oil content and organic load, but the treated wastewater did not meet safe discharge limits. Hence, bioremediation assays were conducted using a mixed culture.
This study aims to investigate bacteria for biodegradation of oil pollutants from oily industrial wastewater to be used as bioremediation tools and to determine the characterization of bioremediation bioassays. A screening bioassay was carried out using six exogenous environmental bacterial strains to degrade oily pollution, which indicated promising clearance of the oily wastewater. Two strains, namely Enterobacter cloacae 279-56 (R4) and Pseudomonas otitis MCC10330 (R19), could successfully eliminate oil content and reasonable removal of the organic load. Results showed that the two promising bacterial candidates (R4 and R19) were selected according to the preliminary screening of the six tested bacteria considered the most efficient for all the tested parameters. The highest Removal Efficiency (Removal Efficiency resulted in Residual levels of total dissolved solids (TDS), biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, and Oil content in the treated oily wastewater effluents are 1940, 171, 131, and 84 mg/l respectively where these results are not within safe discharge limits, except for TDS. Hence, the bioremediation assays were carried out using the mixed culture since it was the most efficient strain for degrading all tested parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据