4.6 Article

Facile dione protection to benzo[1,2-b:6,5-b']dithiophene-4,5-dione (BDTD) in triggering ultraviolet emission - A new member of the emissive 3,3′-bridged dithiophenes

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 4713-4720

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra07492c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We found that by protecting the diketone of BDTD, two isomers were obtained, and both compounds effectively emit UV light in solution. BDTD-6 can also effectively emit in its crystalline state with a quantum yield of 14% and an average fluorescence lifetime of 1.6 ns. These two isomers not only expand the emissive members of the 3,3'-fused dithiophene family, but also extend the emission boundary of emitters in this category to the UV area.
To date, 3,3 '-bridged dithiophenes with bridges developed from the first period elements (either pristine or oxidised) are non emissive. Benzo[1,2-b:6,5-b']dithiophene-4,5-dione (BDTD) is a typical 3,3 ' fused-dithiophene with a dione bridge. It is a critical building block for semiconducting materials, and it is non emissive. We serendipitously discovered that by protecting the diketone of BDTD with ethylene glycol, two isomers (BDTD-5 and 6) were obtained and both compounds effectively emit UV light in solution. Their maximum emission (382 and 375 nm for BDTD-5 and 6, respectively) are independent of the type of solvent. Both compounds exhibited fluorescence intensity enhancement in DMF-H2O with the increase of water fraction from 0-90%. BDTD-6 can also effectively emit in its crystalline state with a quantum yield (QY) of 14% and an average fluorescence lifetime of 1.6 ns. X-ray crystallographic analysis indicates that BDTD-6 possesses a 3D C-(HO)-O- horizontal ellipsis interaction structure which produced its effective emission in the crystalline state. These two isomers not only have enlarged the emissive members of the 3,3 '-fused dithiophene family, but also expand the emission boundary of emitters in this category to the UV area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据