4.2 Article

Neostagonosporella bambusicola sp. nov. (Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) from bamboo in China

期刊

PHYTOTAXA
卷 573, 期 2, 页码 262-274

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.573.2.6

关键词

1 new taxon; Bambusicolous fungi; Dothideomycetes; Neostagonosporella; Phaeosphaeriaceae; Pleosporales

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [32170019, 31670027]
  2. Open Fund Program of Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University [GZUKEY 20160705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new bitunicate ascomycete species, Neostagonosporella bambusicola, was collected from dead bamboo leaves in Guizhou Province, China. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed its placement in the genus Neostagonosporella and revealed its close relationship with N. sichuanensis.
A bitunicate ascomycete was collected on dead bamboo leaves from Guizhou Province, China. Phylogenetic analyses based on large subunit rRNA (LSU), small subunit rRNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef 1-alpha) and internal transcribed spacers (ITS) revealed that this species belongs to the genus Neostagonosporella (Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) and forms a well-supported lineage (98% ML, 1.00BYPP) with N. sichuanensis. This taxon resembles the type species of Neostagonosporella, N. sichuanensis by its globose to subglobose central ostiolate ascomata, cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, short pedicellate asci and hyaline, cylindrical to fusiform ascospores, as well as a close phylogenetic affinity. However, it differs from N. sichuanensis by its comparatively smaller ascomata, cellular, septate pseudoparaphyses and ascospores with thick sheath, whereas N. sichuanensis has comparatively large ascomata, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses and ascospores with comparatively thin sheath. Therefore, we introduce this taxon as a novel species, namely Neostagonosporella bambusicola and compare it with the other species of Neostagonosporella.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据