4.6 Article

GaAs-enabled tunable multifunctional devices based on three coupling mechanisms for terahertz metamaterials

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 423-433

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OME.477441

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a terahertz metamaterial structure with multiple physical features including EIT-like resonance, Fano resonance, and terahertz wave absorption. The device consists of a metal structure and a GaAs layer, with the conductivity of GaAs adjustable by optical pump. By adjusting the conductivity of GaAs, the resonance can be modulated with a maximum modulation depth of 96.5%. The device exhibits excellent performance in refractive index sensing, with a maximum sensitivity of 513 GHz/RIU and a maximum FOM value of 39.5. It has wide applications in terahertz sensors, slow-light devices, and terahertz modulators.
In this paper, a terahertz metamaterial structure with multiple physical features such as EIT-like resonance, Fano resonance, and terahertz wave absorption, is implemented. The device consists of a metal structure and a GaAs layer. The conductivity of GaAs can be adjusted by optical pump. When the conductivity of GaAs is 10 S/m, with the TE polarization wave incenting, the Fano resonance formed, and when the TM polarization wave was incenting, the EIT-like resonance formed. Modulation of the resonance can be achieved by adjusting the conductivity of GaAs, and a maximum modulation depth of 96.5% is obtained. When the conductivity of GaAs is 2 x 105 S/m, a double narrow-band absorption is obtained with TM polarization wave exciting. The maximum sensitivity reaches 513 GHz/RIU and the maximum FOM value reaches 39.5, which indicates that the device has excellent performance in refractive index sensing. The device also has a wide range of applications in terahertz sensors, slow-light devices, and terahertz modulators.(c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据