4.7 Article

Maternal Diet Quality during Pregnancy and Allergic and Respiratory Multimorbidity Clusters in Children from the EDEN Mother-Child Cohort

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15010146

关键词

maternal diet; asthma and allergic diseases; children; cluster analysis; birth cohort

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study investigated the associations between maternal diet quality and allergic and respiratory diseases in children. The results showed that maternal diet quality during pregnancy was not associated with allergic and respiratory diseases, but children from mothers consuming legumes less frequently were at higher risk of having multiple allergies.
We investigated the associations between maternal diet quality and allergic and respiratory diseases in children. Analyses were based on 1316 mother-child pairs from the EDEN mother-child cohort. Maternal diet quality during pregnancy was assessed through a food-based score (the Diet Quality), a nutrient-based score (the PANDiet), and the adherence to guidelines for main food groups. Clusters of allergic and respiratory multimorbidity clusters up to 8 years were identified using Latent Class Analysis. Associations were assessed by adjusted multinomial logistic regressions. Four clusters were identified for children: asymptomatic (67%, reference group), asthma only (14%), allergies without asthma (12%), multi-allergic (7%). These clusters were not associated with mother diet quality assessed by both scores. Children from mothers consuming legumes once a month or less were at higher risk of belonging to the multi-allergic cluster (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (95%CI)) = 1.60 (1.01;2.54)). No association was found with other food groups or other clusters. In our study, allergic and respiratory multimorbidity in children was described with four distinct clusters. Our results suggest an interest in legumes consumption in the prevention of allergic diseases but need to be confirmed in larger cohorts and randomized control trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据