4.7 Article

What's to Eat and Drink on Campus? Public and Planetary Health, Public Higher Education, and the Public Good

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15010196

关键词

diet and health; food environments; food justice; food security; neoliberalism; planetary health; public health; public higher education; sufficient consumption; sustainable consumption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public higher education institutions play a vital role in addressing the public and planetary health crisis, but the food environments on their campuses are unhealthy and unsustainable. These environments contribute to unhealthy food choices and impact student health. To address this, PHEIs need to move beyond neoliberal policies and prioritize health, environment, and equity in their food decisions.
Public higher education institutions (PHEIs) have a unique and important role in responding to the public and planetary health crisis-they are centers of research on public and planetary health and of learning for young people, and have a public good mission. Yet, PHEI campus food environments are predominantly unhealthy and environmentally unsustainable, and associated with unhealthy food choices and unhealthy students. PHEIs are addressing high levels of student food insecurity (FI) that disproportionately affect the most vulnerable groups. Yet, because student FI is measured as individual access to adequate quantities of food, campus responses to FI often overlook unhealthy food environments. These environments result from neoliberal PHEI business policies that prioritize short-term revenue and encourage superfluous consumption, and unhealthy, environmentally harmful diets. PHEIs need to move beyond neoliberalism to honor their public good mission, including prioritizing health, the environment, and equity, in decisions about food on campus. My goal in this perspective is to encourage inclusive campus discussion about why this change is required to adequately respond to the crisis of student, public, and planetary health, and about how to begin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据