4.7 Article

Representations of Low(er) Alcohol (Craft) Beer in the United States

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14234952

关键词

craft beer; low alcohol beer; non-alcoholic beer; social trends; qualitatively-informed quantitative analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing social interest in health and wellness, low(er) alcohol beer has become a rising segment in the beer industry. This paper assesses the representation of low(er) alcohol beer among craft brewers in the United States. The study finds that ales are the most prominent style of low(er) alcohol beer offered, with 15.5% of breweries offering beer with less than 4% ABV and 67.9% offering beer with less than 5% ABV. The representations of these low(er) alcohol products primarily focus on taste, health, and demographic indicators.
Given increasing social interest in health and wellness, rising cultural trends toward sobriety and moderating alcohol intake, and improvements in brewing technology, low(er) alcohol beer is a rising segment in the beer industry for both craft and larger-scale producers. In this paper, we assess the representation of low(er) alcohol beer among craft brewers in the United States. Using a novel quantitatively-informed qualitative analytical approach, we surveyed a randomized, non-representative sample of 400 craft brewery websites in the United States to assess the relative presence of low(er) alcohol beers as well as how these brews are represented by the breweries themselves. To do so, we recorded, both numerically and via website screenshots, the lowest ABV beverage on offer and noted the beer type, the beer name, and the ABV. Ales were the most prominent style of beer on offer, accounting for 62% of the low(er) ABV beers identified. Only 15.5% of the breweries surveyed in this study offered a beer with an ABV of less than 4%; however, an additional 67.9% offered a beer with an ABV of less than 5%. The representations of these low(er) alcohol products focused mostly on taste, health, and demographic indicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据