4.7 Article

Association between Osteoporosis and Meniere's Disease: Two Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Studies

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14224885

关键词

Meniere's disease; osteoporosis; risk factors; cohort studies; epidemiology

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2020R1A2C212660, NRF2020R1A2C4002594]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that adults with Meniere's disease are at a higher risk of osteoporosis, and adults with osteoporosis are also at a higher risk of Meniere's disease.
A high rate of Meniere's disease (MD) in patients with osteoporosis has been suggested. This research intended to estimate the bidirectional association of MD with osteoporosis. The >= 40-year-old population in the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort 2002-2019 was examined. In study I, 9529 patients with MD and 38,116 control I participants were analyzed for a previous history of osteoporosis. In study II, 65,858 patients with osteoporosis and 65,858 control II participants were analyzed for a previous history of MD. Stratified Cox proportional hazard models were applied to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of MD for osteoporosis in study I and of osteoporosis for MD in study II. The rate of a prior history of osteoporosis was 13.3% for the MD group and 11.3% for the control I group. The patients with MD had a 1.12 times higher HR for previous osteoporosis (95% CI = 1.04-1.20). In study II, the rate or a prior history of MD was 3.7% for patients with osteoporosis and 2.0% for the control II group. The patients with osteoporosis had a 1.50 times higher HR for previous MD (95% CI = 1.40-1.61). Most subgroups according to age, sex, and comorbid conditions demonstrated consistent bidirectional associations between MD and osteoporosis. Adult patients with MD had a greater risk of osteoporosis. In addition, adult patients with osteoporosis also showed a higher risk of MD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据