4.7 Article

Malnutrition and Erythropoietin Resistance among Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: Where Is the Perpetrator of Disaster?

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14245318

关键词

malnutrition; dialysis; inflammation; cytokines; adipokines; erythropoietin resistance; obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the role of leptin and chosen cytokines in the development of malnutrition-inflammation syndrome (MIS) and erythropoietin resistance. The results show a negative correlation between leptin and erythropoietin resistance, while IL-6 shows the opposite. IL-6 is more linked to hemodialysis parameters and vintage, while TNF-alpha and leptin are more dependent on body composition.
Background: Hemodialyzed patients with poor erythropoietin response tend to have low volume of visceral adipose tissue and score high on malnutrition-inflammation score. This study investigates in-depth the role of leptin and chosen cytokines in the development of malnutrition-inflammation syndrome (MIS) and erythropoietin resistance. Methods: Eighty-one hemodialyzed patients with erythropoietin-treated anemia were enrolled in the study. Their body composition was measured. Erythropoietin resistance index was calculated. Blood samples for leptin, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-alpha, and IL-1-alpha serum levels were drawn. Results: Leptin showed negative correlation with erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), whilst IL-6 showed the opposite. IL-6 seemed to be linked more to HD parameters and vintage, while TNF-alpha and leptin were more dependent on body composition. IL-18 and IL-1-alpha did not affect nutritional parameters nor ERI. Conclusion: Modulation of adipokine- and cytokine-related signaling is a promising target in tempering malnutrition in hemodialyzed, and thus achieving better outcomes in anemia treatment. Large clinical studies that target the inflammatory response in hemodialysis, especially regarding IL-6, TNF-alpha, and leptin, would be of great worth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据