4.7 Review

Chrononutrition-When We Eat Is of the Essence in Tackling Obesity

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14235080

关键词

obesity; circadian clocks; time restricted feeding; energy homeostasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity is a chronic health problem that is associated with numerous comorbidities. Its global prevalence has tripled over the past five decades and poses a serious threat to society and future generations. Diet plays a key role in the development of obesity, and the timing of meals is increasingly recognized as essential for human metabolism.
Obesity is a chronic and relapsing public health problem with an extensive list of associated comorbidities. The worldwide prevalence of obesity has nearly tripled over the last five decades and continues to pose a serious threat to wider society and the wellbeing of future generations. The pathogenesis of obesity is complex but diet plays a key role in the onset and progression of the disease. The human diet has changed drastically across the globe, with an estimate that approximately 72% of the calories consumed today come from foods that were not part of our ancestral diets and are not compatible with our metabolism. Additionally, multiple nutrient-independent factors, e.g., cost, accessibility, behaviours, culture, education, work commitments, knowledge and societal set-up, influence our food choices and eating patterns. Much research has been focused on 'what to eat' or 'how much to eat' to reduce the obesity burden, but increasingly evidence indicates that 'when to eat' is fundamental to human metabolism. Aligning feeding patterns to the 24-h circadian clock that regulates a wide range of physiological and behavioural processes has multiple health-promoting effects with anti-obesity being a major part. This article explores the current understanding of the interactions between the body clocks, bioactive dietary components and the less appreciated role of meal timings in energy homeostasis and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据