4.7 Review

Implementation of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Research and Training Activities for Developing Precision Nutrition Strategies in Malaysia

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14235108

关键词

precision nutrition; malnutrition; nutrigenetics; nutrigenomics; nutri-epigenetics; nutrition; artificial intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to address malnutrition in Malaysia and proposes a conceptual framework for implementing precision nutrition strategies. The framework includes research in the fields of genetics, genomics, transcriptomics, and more, as well as training and resource development for stakeholders.
Nutritional epidemiological studies show a triple burden of malnutrition with disparate prevalence across the coexisting ethnicities in Malaysia. To tackle malnutrition and related conditions in Malaysia, research in the new and evolving field of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics is essential. As part of the Gene-Nutrient Interactions (GeNuIne) Collaboration, the Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Research and Training Unit ((NRTU)-R-2) aims to solve the malnutrition paradox. This review discusses and presents a conceptual framework that shows the pathway to implementing and strengthening precision nutrition strategies in Malaysia. The framework is divided into: (1) Research and (2) Training and Resource Development. The first arm collects data from genetics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, gut microbiome, and phenotypic and lifestyle factors to conduct nutrigenetic, nutrigenomic, and nutri-epigenetic studies. The second arm is focused on training and resource development to improve the capacity of the stakeholders (academia, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the food industry) to utilise the findings generated by research in their respective fields. Finally, the (NRTU)-R-2 framework foresees its applications in artificial intelligence and the implementation of precision nutrition through the action of stakeholders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据