4.7 Article

Vitamin A Nutritional Status Is a Key Determinant of Bone Mass in Children

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14214694

关键词

retinol; bone; children

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bone mass changes that occur during childhood play a crucial role in maximizing peak bone mass and preventing osteoporosis in adulthood. This study found that an appropriate plasma retinol concentration and higher intake of vitamin A and beta-carotene may improve bone mineral content in children aged 6-9 years.
The bone mass increases that occur during the period of childhood are of great significance for maximizing the peak bone mass in adults and preventing for osteoporosis. Studies have reported that VA can improve the bone health in adults. Moreover, limited studies have assessed such associations in children. In this cross-sectional study including 426 children, we assessed the children's plasma retinol concentration by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and the dietary intake of VA and carotenoids using a structured Food Frequency Questionnaire. Their bone mineral content and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. After adjusting for potential confounders, the restricted cubic spline revealed an inverted U-shaped association between plasma retinol concentration and BMD; the estimated effects on the TBLH BMD per mu mol/L increase in the plasma retinol concentration were 1.79 x 10(-2) g/cm(2) below 1.24 mu mol/L and -5.78 x 10(-3) g/cm(2) above this point (p for non-linearity = 0.046). A multiple linear regression analysis revealed a positive association between the plasma retinol concentration and the TBLH BMC (beta = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.64 x 10(-1)-3.62, p = 0.032). In conclusion, an appropriate plasma retinol concentration and greater intakes of dietary VA and beta-carotene may enhance the bone mineral status of children who are aged 6-9 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据