4.6 Article

Biologically inspired herding of animal groups by robots

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.14049

关键词

bio-inspired; biomimetic; herding; human-wildlife conflicts; sheepdog; surveillance; unmanned aerial vehicles

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers propose using UAVs for bio-herding in order to manage and control wild animal groups. They suggest a potential framework using a pair of UAVs and highlight the challenges and importance of this approach.
A single sheepdog can bring together and manoeuvre hundreds of sheep from one location to another. Engineers and ecologists are fascinated by this sheepdog herding because of the potential it provides for 'bio-herding': a biologically inspired herding of animal groups by robots. Although many herding algorithms have been proposed, most are studied via simulation. There are a variety of ecological problems where management of wild animal groups is currently impossible, dangerous and/or costly for humans to manage directly, and which may benefit from bio-herding solutions. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) now deliver significant benefits to the economy and society. Here, we suggest the use of UAVs for bio-herding. Given their mobility and speed, UAVs can be used in a wide range of environments and interact with animal groups at sea, over the land and in the air. We present a potential roadmap for achieving bio-herding using a pair of UAVs. In our framework, one UAV performs 'surveillance' of animal groups, informing the movement of a second UAV that herds them. We highlight the promise and flexibility of a paired UAV approach while emphasising its practical and ethical challenges. We start by describing the types of experiments and data required to understand individual and collective responses to UAVs. Next, we describe how to develop appropriate herding algorithms. Finally, we describe the integration of bio-herding algorithms into software and hardware architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据