4.6 Article

Corrosion Activity of Carbon Steel B450C and Stainless Steel SS430 Exposed to Extract Solution of a Supersulfated Cement

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15248782

关键词

carbon steel; stainless steel; pumice; supersulfated cement; Portland cement; cement extract solution; corrosion potential; pH; SEM-EDS; XRD; XPS; EIS

资金

  1. Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the supersulfated cement extract solution, both carbon steel and low-chromium stainless steel surfaces were corroded, but different corrosion products were formed at different pH values. The thickness of the corrosion layer also varied.
Carbon steel B450C and low-chromium stainless steel SS430 were exposed for 30 days to supersulfated SS1 cement extract solution, considered as a green alternative for partial replacement of the Portland cement clinker. The initial pH of 12.38 dropped since the first day to 7.84, accompanied by a displacement to more negative values of the free corrosion potential (OCP) of the carbon steel up to approximate to-480.74 mV, giving the formation of gamma-FeOOH, alpha-FeOOH and Fe2O3, as suggested by XRD and XPS analysis. In the meantime, the OCP of the SS430 tended towards more positive values (+182.50 mV), although at lower pH, and XPS analysis revealed the presence of Cr(OH)(3) and FeO as corrosion products, as well the crystals of CaCO3, NaCl and KCl. On both surfaces, a localized corrosion attack was observed in the vicinity of local cathodes (Cu, Mn-carbides, Cr-nitrides, among others), influenced by the presence of Cl- ions in the SS1 extract solution, originating from the pumice. Two equivalent circuits were proposed for the quantitative analysis of EIS Nyquist and Bode diagrams, whose data were correlated with the OCP values and pH change in time of the SS1 extract solution. The thickness of the corrosion layer formed on the SS430 surface was approximate to 0.8 nm, while that on the B450C layer was approximate to 0.3 nm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据