4.6 Article

Worst-Case X-ray Photon Energies in Ultrashort Pulse Laser Processing

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15248996

关键词

ultrashort pulsed laser; X-ray emission; X-ray spectrum; X-ray energies; X-ray dose rate; radiation protection

资金

  1. German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)
  2. [3620S22373]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectral X-ray emissions were investigated during ultrashort pulse laser processing of tungsten and steel. It was found that burst mode laser processing significantly increases dose rates and X-ray photon energies.
Ultrashort pulse laser processing can result in the secondary generation of unwanted X-rays if a critical laser irradiance of about 10(13) W cm(-2) is exceeded. Spectral X-ray emissions were investigated during the processing of tungsten and steel using three complementary spectrometers (based on CdTe and silicon drift detectors) simultaneously for the identification of a worst-case spectral scenario. Therefore, maximum X-ray photon energies were determined, and corresponding dose equivalent rates were calculated. An ultrashort pulse laser workstation with a pulse duration of 274 fs, a center wavelength of 1030 nm, pulse repetition rates between 50 kHz and 200 kHz, and a Gaussian laser beam focused to a spot diameter of 33 mu m was employed in a single pulse and burst laser operation mode. Different combinations of laser pulse energy and repetition rate were utilized, keeping the average laser power constant close to the maximum power of 20 W. Peak irradiances I-0 ranging from 7.3 x 10(13) W cm(-2) up to 3.0 x 10(14) W cm(-2) were used. The X-ray dose equivalent rate increases for lower repetition rates and higher pulse energy if a constant average power is used. Laser processing with burst mode significantly increases the dose rates and the X-ray photon energies. A maximum X-ray photon energy of about 40 keV was observed for burst mode processing of tungsten with a repetition rate of 50 kHz and a peak irradiance of 3 x 10(14) W cm(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据