4.6 Article

Pin-Shaped Surface Structures Generated by Laser Single Pulse Drilling for High-Strength Interfaces in Thermally Joined Polymer-Metal Hybrids

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16020687

关键词

polymer-metal hybrid; laser micromachining; polyamide 6; EN AW-6082; mechanical interlocking; surface structuring; thermal joining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser structuring is extensively studied for metal surface-pretreatment to enhance adhesion in polymer-metal hybrids. Cone-like protrusions exhibit excellent wetting behavior and high compound strength but require significant processing time. This paper investigates a process strategy for creating scalable pin structures using single pulse drilling with an Nd/YVO4 nanosecond laser system on EN AW-6082 aluminum alloy. Experimental results show that pulse drilling can achieve pin structures with high aspect ratio and strength values comparable to cone-like protrusions, but with a much higher processing rate.
Laser structuring is by far the most investigated metal surface-pretreatment method for creating adhesion in polymer-metal hybrids. Especially, cone-like protrusions show excellent wetting behaviour as well as high compound strength. However, the processing time is extremely high. Therefore, this paper assesses a process strategy for creating pin structures with scalable height by single pulse drilling with an Nd/YVO4 nanosecond laser system on EN AW-6082 aluminium alloy. The strength testing is carried out by butt-bonded hollow cylinder torsion. The samples are manufactured by heat-conduction thermal joining with polyamide 6. Ten different surface structures with two different ablation diameters are investigated and compared to cone-like protrusions in terms of processing time, wetting behaviour, shear strength and fracture behaviour. The experimental results show that pulse drilling pins structures with high aspect ratio reach-strength values close to cone-like protrusions but with 31 times higher processing rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据