4.6 Article

Improving the p-Type CuCrO2 Thin Film's Electrical and Optical Properties

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16031000

关键词

delafossite material; CuCrO2; thin film growth; energy efficiency; spin coating; microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, the functional properties of CuCrO2, the most promising p-type transparent conductive oxide (TCO), were studied. Thin films were fabricated using a spin coating technique. X-ray diffraction and UV-visible absorption were used to analyze the film's diffraction patterns and absorption characteristics. FESEM analysis was used to analyze the physical properties of film formation and surface morphology. Aging properties were analyzed with different precursors and aging times. The CuCrO2 thin films exhibited better transmittance, resistance, figure of merit, and electrical conductivity.
In this research, we studied the functional properties of CuCrO2, which is the most promising p-type transparent conductive oxide (TCO). The thin films were fabricated using a spin coating technique. The diffraction patterns were obtained with the help of X-ray diffractions, and the optical properties of absorption characteristics were studied using UV-visible absorption. The physical properties of film formation and surface morphology were analyzed using FESEM analysis. The aging properties were also analyzed with the help of various precursors with different aging times. The CuCrO2 thin films' functional properties were determined by using chelating agent and precursor solution aging times. The CuCrO2 thin films have better transmittance, resistance, figure of merit (FOM), and electrical conductivity. Moreover, the resistivity values of the CuCrO2 thin films are 7.01, 9.90, 12.54, 4.10, 2.42, and 0.35 Omega cm. The current research article covers the preparation of copper chromium delafossite thin films. These thin films can be suitable for hole transport layers in transparent optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据