4.6 Article

Experimental Study on Hot Spot Stresses of Curved Composite Twin-Girder Bridges

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15227920

关键词

experimental study; hot spot stress; curved composite twin-girder bridge; fatigue detail; fatigue assessment

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M692746]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JQ-272]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [300102211303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Curved composite twin-girder bridges are suitable for mountainous areas, but fatigue failure is a critical issue. This study designed specimens and proposed new NS and HSS methods to evaluate fatigue performance.
Curved composite twin-girder bridges are suitable for mountainous areas, due to their advantages of light self-weight, excellent mechanical performance, and fewer construction requirements. It has been found that many composite twin-girder bridges collapsed due to fatigue failure. However, the literature review showed no relevant studies on the fatigue performance of curved composite twin-girder bridges. Because of this, the specimen of 1:2 scale curved composite twin-girder bridge in accordance with the design scheme of Xizhen Bridge in China was designed and tested. Three possible fatigue details were selected: cruciform connections, transverse attachments, and transverse splices named Class I, Class II, and Class III. For the test data of nominal stress (NS), equations were proposed to convert the strain value into the internal force of the fatigue detail position. The stress caused by torsion accounts for 2.8% of the total stress, which is almost negligible. The fatigue evaluation process based on the hot spot stress (HSS) S-N curve method is presented. The HSS method is more conservative than the NS S-N curve method in predicting the fatigue life of complex structures with high-stress concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据