4.5 Article

Topological phase transition and evolution of edge states in In-rich InGaN/GaN quantum wells under hydrostatic pressure

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/29/5/055702

关键词

topological insulators; group-III nitrides; hydrostatic pressure

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2012/07/B/ST3/03174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining the k center dot p method with the third-order elasticity theory, we perform a theoretical study of the pressure-induced topological phase transition and the pressure evolution of topologically protected edge states in InN/GaN and In-rich InGaN/GaN quantum wells. We show that for a certain range of the quantum well parameters, thanks to a negative band gap pressure coefficient, it is possible to continuously drive the system from the normal insulator state through the topological insulator into the semimetal phase. The critical pressure for the topological phase transition depends not only on the quantum well thickness but also on the width of the Hall bar, which determines the coupling between the edge states localized at the opposite edges. We also find that in narrow Hall bar structures, near the topological phase transition, a significant Rashba-type spin splitting of the lower and upper branches of the edge state dispersion curve appears. This effect originates from the lack of the mirror symmetry of the quantum well potential caused by the built-in electric field, and can be suppressed by increasing the Hall bar width. When the pressure increases, the energy dispersion of the edge states becomes more parabolic-like and the spin splitting decreases. A further increase of pressure leads to the transition to a semimetal phase, which occurs due to the closure of the indirect 2D bulk band gap. The difference between the critical pressure at which the system becomes semimetallic, and the pressure for the topological phase transition, correlates with the variation of the pressure coefficient of the band gap in the normal insulator state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据