4.4 Article

Negotiating boundaries: an intersectional collaboration to advance women academics in engineering

期刊

ENGINEERING STUDIES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 9-29

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2023.2169613

关键词

Collaboration; engineering; broadening participation; intersectionality; ethnography; emotions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines how a diverse group of women in academic engineering supported early-career women by drawing on data from the NSF-funded LATTICE program. Using ethnography, the authors analyze the social dynamics and power relations involved in forming a coherent group identity for the leadership team of LATTICE. They identify processes and behaviors that help build a coherent community across various dimensions of difference and offer actionable strategies for change agents working across intersecting dimensions of difference.
This paper draws on data from the National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE-funded LATTICE program (Launching Academics on the Tenure-Track: an Intentional Community in Engineering) to examine how a diverse group of women worked across social and professional identities to support early-career women in academic engineering. We used ethnography to elucidate the social dynamics and power relations involved in forming a coherent group identity for the LATTICE leadership team, and the boundaries we negotiated in running the LATTICE program. We identify the processes and behaviors through which we made boundaries between members salient yet porous to build a coherent community across various dimensions of difference. We offer three actionable strategies that impact change agents' engagement and the group's coherence across multiple dimensions of difference: (1) intentionally creating a socio-emotional culture in our group, one that spans across group members' personal and professional identities; (2) validating other group members' perspectives, and (3) striving to build consensus using storytelling. These strategies of the LATTICE leadership team provide guidelines for others who work across intersecting dimensions of difference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据