4.5 Review

Cooling down with Entresto. Can sacubitril/valsartan combination enhance browning more than coldness?

期刊

DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13098-022-00944-4

关键词

Sacubitril; Valsartan; Cold; Obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold exposure and sacubitril/valsartan treatment have significant effects on the function and metabolism of brown adipose tissue (BAT). Further research should focus on exploring the synergistic effects of sacubitril/valsartan treatment in low temperature environmental conditions.
Background It is a growing importance to induce a new treatment approach to encourage weight loss but also to improve maintenance of lost weight. It has been shown that promotion of brown adipose tissue (BAT) function or acquisition of BAT characteristics in white adipose tissue (terms referred as browning) can be protective against obesity. Main text Amongst numerous established environmental influences on BAT activity, cold exposure is the best interested technique due to its not only effects on of BAT depots in proliferation process but also de novo differentiation of precursor cells via beta-adrenergic receptor activation. A novel combination drug, sacubitril/valsartan, has been shown to be more efficient in reducing cardiovascular events and heart failure readmission compared to conventional therapy. Also, this combination of drugs increases the postprandial lipid oxidation contributing to energy expenditure, promotes lipolysis in adipocytes and reduces body weight. To date, there is no research examining potential of combined sacubitril/valsartan use to promote browning or mechanisms in the basis of this thermogenic process. Conclusion Due to the pronounced effects of cold and sacubitril/valsartan treatment on function and metabolism of BAT, the primary goal of further research should focused on investigation of the synergistic effects of the sacubitril/valsartan treatment at low temperature environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据