4.6 Article

Synthesis, anticancer evaluation, and molecular modeling study of new 2-(phenylamino)pyrazolo [1,5-a]pyrimidine analogues

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104437

关键词

3-aminopyrazoles; Pyrazolopyrimidines; Molecular modelling; MCF-7; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Deanship of Sci- entific Research at King Khalid University
  2. [RGP.1/102/43]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of substituted pyrazolopyrimidine analogues were synthesized and their properties and anticancer activity were investigated. The results showed that certain compounds exhibited remarkable cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and Hep-2 cell lines.
The reaction of 3-amino-5-phenylaminopyrazoles 2 with 3-(dimethylamino) acrylonitrile derivatives resulted in a series of substituted pyrazolopyrimidine analogues 4 and 6. The DFT stud-ies of the isolated compounds showed that the frontier molecular orbitals energy gap was close and in the 2.65-2.81 eV range where the derivative 6b has the lowest and both of 4a and 4c have the highest values. Meanwhile, the anticancer activity of the newly synthesized pyrazolopyrimidine ana-logues have been tested against several different cell lines (MCF-7, PC3, Hep-2 and WI38). The investigated pyrazolopyrimidines showed remarkable cytotoxicity activity against the MCF-7 and Hep-2 cell lines. In comparison to the effects of 5-fluorouracil, IC50 = 10.19 +/- 0.42 and 7.19 +/- 0.47, compounds 6a-c demonstrated potential anticancer activity with IC50 values for MCF-7 (10.80 +/- 0.36-19.84 +/- 0.49 lM) and Hep-2 (8.85 +/- 0.24-12.76 +/- 0.16 lM). Important details regarding the protein's binding sites were disclosed when the produced analogues docked with the crystal structure of the KDM5A protein, which was located in the protein data library.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据