4.8 Review

Solar Hydrogen

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202203019

关键词

electrolysis; hydrogen; photocatalysis; photoelectrochemistry; photovoltaics; solar energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen, a zero-pollution, sustainable, low-cost, and high-efficiency energy source, has great potential for the 21st century. Solar water-splitting techniques, such as photovoltaic-electrolysis (PV-EC) and photoelectrochemistry (PEC), have shown promise with solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency over 10%. However, there is a gap between laboratory research and practical application, which can be addressed by understanding the basic principles, historical developments, and performing comprehensive techno-economic analysis.
Hydrogen, produced through a zero-pollution, sustainable, low-cost, and high-efficiency process, is regarded as the ultimate energy of the 21st century. Solar water-splitting techniques have immense potential to make the idea a reality. Two promising approaches, photovoltaic-electrolysis (PV-EC) and photoelectrochemistry (PEC), have demonstrated solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency over 10%, which is the minimum required for competitively priced, large-scale systems. Extensive studies of PV-EC and PEC devices reported within the past five decades show increasing design complexity. To accurately describe the gap between laboratory research and practical application, the basic principles and concepts of PV-EC and PEC are elaborated and clarified. The history of these developments is systematically summarized, and a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of PV-EC and PEC solar hydrogen production of 10 000 kg H-2 day(-1) is performed. The analysis shows that no solar hydrogen system is currently competitive with production methods based on fossil fuels, but the development of high-efficiency water-splitting electrolyzers with cost-competitive components (especially for cation/anion exchange membranes) can accelerate progress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据