4.8 Article

Identifying Descriptors for Promoted Rhodium-Based Catalysts for Higher Alcohol Synthesis via Machine Learning

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 15373-15385

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c04349

关键词

syngas; computational screening; feature engineering; alloy formation energy

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [180544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A machine learning approach is used to predict and rationalize the performance of Rh-Mn-P/SiO2 catalysts, with cohesive energy and alloy formation energy of promoters revealed as significant descriptors.
Rhodium-based catalysts offer remarkable selectivities toward higher alcohols, specifically ethanol, via syngas conversion. However, the addition of metal promoters is required to increase reactivity, augmenting the complexity of the system. Herein, we present an interpretable machine learning (ML) approach to predict and rationalize the performance of Rh-Mn-P/SiO2 catalysts (P = 19 promoters) using the open-source dataset on Rh-catalyzed higher alcohol synthesis (HAS) from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). A random forest model trained on this dataset comprising 19 alkali, transition, post-transition metals, and metalloid promoters, using catalytic descriptors and reaction conditions, predicts the higher alcohols space-time yield (STYHA) with an accuracy of R2 = 0.76. The promoter's cohesive energy and alloy formation energy with Rh are revealed as significant descriptors during posterior feature-importance analysis. Their interplay is captured as a dimensionless property, coined promoter affinity index (PAI), which exhibits volcano correlations for space-time yield. Based on this descriptor, we develop guidelines for the rational selection of promoters in designing improved Rh-Mn-P/SiO2 catalysts. This study highlights ML as a tool for computational screening and performance prediction of unseen catalysts and simultaneously draws insights into the property-performance relations of complex catalytic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据