4.8 Article

Cobalt(II)-Catalyzed C-H Alkylation of N-Heterocycles with 1,4-Dihydropyridines

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 15707-15714

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c04741

关键词

alkylation; cobalt; dihydropyridine; heterocycles; radical reaction

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [2022R1A4A1018930]
  2. [2020R1A2C3005357]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2022R1A4A1018930] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a cobalt(II)-catalyzed method for C-H alkylation and acylation of N-heterocycles using 1,4-dihydropyridines (DHPs) as alkylating and acylating agents was reported. The combination of KBrO3 and a Co(II) catalyst successfully generated alkyl and acyl radicals from DHPs. This method was applicable to various heterocycles and demonstrated selectivity in modifying drug candidates and synthesizing bioactive molecules on a gram scale.
The rapid incorporation of alkyl and acyl groups into C-H bonds of N-heterocycles is in demand for the development of lead candidates in drug discovery. Herein, we report the cobalt(II)-catalyzed C-H alkylation and acylation of N-heterocycles with 1,4-dihydropyridines (DHPs) as alkylating and acylating agents. Notably, a combination of KBrO3 and a Co(II) catalyst was successfully employed for the generation of alkyl and acyl radicals from DHPs. A series of heterocycles, including azauracils, quinoxalinones, pyrazinones, pyridones, quinolones, quinazolinones, xanthines, chromones, and azine N-oxides, were compatible under the developed conditions. The applicability of the developed protocol in challenging contexts is highlighted by the selective modification of drug candidates as well as the gram-scale synthesis of bioactive molecules. Combined mechanistic investigations aided the elucidation of a plausible reaction mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据