4.8 Article

High-Throughput Computational Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks as High-Performance Electrocatalysts for CO2RR

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 15271-15281

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c05155

关键词

metal-organic frameworks; carbon dioxide reduction reaction; electrocatalysis; high-throughput computational screening; formic acid production

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2021YFB3500700]
  4. [51802015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are potential electrocatalytic materials for the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR). Through computational and experimental screening, three MOFs were identified as potential catalysts for the electrocatalytic CO2RR. Additionally, the study proposes that the polarity of coordination bonds plays a significant role in CO2 activation and product selectivity.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are considered as promising electrocatalytic materials for the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) due to their various excellent properties. Here, through multistep high-throughput screening of the Computation-Ready, Experimental (CoRE) MOF database, including structural rationality check, pore size screening, adsorption capacity prediction, open metal site identification, CO2 molecular activation capacity, and reaction path calculation, MOFs named GAFRUD, CAJQEL, and cg400449c are identified as potential catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2RR. Furthermore, based on density functional theory calculations, we propose that the polarity of the coordination bonds between the metal atoms and the coordination atoms in ligands has a significant impact on the activation of CO2 molecules, and the selectivity of HCOOH mainly depends on the adsorption energy difference between *HCOO and *COOH. This principle is further validated by the experimental results, which will provide guidelines for the rational design of MOF-based electrocatalysts for CO2RR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据