4.8 Article

Increased levels of endogenous retroviruses trigger fibroinflammation and play a role in kidney disease development

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36212-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammation is a common feature in chronic kidney disease, and endogenous retroviruses can activate cytosolic nucleotide sensors causing renal fibroinflammation.
Inflammation is a common feature of all forms of chronic kidney disease; however, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Evolutionarily inherited endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have the potential to trigger an immune reaction. Comprehensive RNA-sequencing of control and diseased kidneys from human and mouse disease models indicated higher expression of transposable elements (TEs) and ERVs in diseased kidneys. Loss of cytosine methylation causing epigenetic derepression likely contributes to an increase in ERV levels. Genetic deletion/pharmacological inhibition of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) induces ERV expression. In cultured kidney tubule cells, ERVs elicit the activation of cytosolic nucleotide sensors such as RIG-I, MDA5, and STING. ERVs expressions in kidney tubules trigger RIG-I/STING, and cytokine expression, and correlate with the presence of immune cells. Genetic deletion of RIG-I or STING or treatment with reverse transcriptase inhibitor ameliorates kidney fibroinflammation. Our data indicate an important role of epigenetic derepression-induced ERV activation triggering renal fibroinflammation. The contribution of transposable elements and endogenous retroviruses to renal fibroinflammation is currently unknown. Here, the authors comprehensively profile the expression of transposable elements and endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) in kidneys of patients and mouse disease models and find expression of ERVs in diseased kidneys activate cytosolic nucleotide sensors contributing to cytokine release and renal fibroinflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据