4.8 Article

Targeting anti-apoptotic pathways eliminates senescent melanocytes and leads to nevi regression

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35657-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Foundation [10989]
  2. Horizon2020 EU framework Program
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that senescent melanocytes in culture and nevi express high levels of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-W, but remain insensitive to the pan-BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-263. Resistance to ABT-263 is driven by mTOR-mediated enhanced translation of another anti-apoptotic protein, MCL-1. The combination of ABT-263 and MCL-1 inhibitors results in synthetic lethality to senescent melanocytes, with topical application sufficient to eliminate nevi.
Human melanocytic nevi (moles) result from a brief period of clonal expansion of melanocytes. As a cellular defensive mechanism against oncogene-induced hyperplasia, nevus-resident melanocytes enter a senescent state of stable cell cycle arrest. Senescent melanocytes can persist for months in mice and years in humans with a risk to escape the senescent state and progress to melanoma. The mechanisms providing prolonged survival of senescent melanocytes remain poorly understood. Here, we show that senescent melanocytes in culture and in nevi express high level of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family member BCL-W but remain insensitive to the pan-BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-263. We demonstrate that resistance to ABT-263 is driven by mTOR-mediated enhanced translation of another anti-apoptotic member, MCL-1. Strikingly, the combination of ABT-263 and MCL-1 inhibitors results in synthetic lethality to senescent melanocytes, and its topical application sufficient to eliminate nevi in male mice. These data highlight the important role of redundant anti-apoptotic mechanisms for the survival advantage of senescent melanocytes, and the proof-of-concept for a non-invasive combination therapy for nevi removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据